(no title)
greazy | 22 days ago
We've been using "AI" in science far longer than you realise. We happily take on new tech at breath taking speed.
Don't waste your time, please just focus on her and not the disease.
greazy | 22 days ago
We've been using "AI" in science far longer than you realise. We happily take on new tech at breath taking speed.
Don't waste your time, please just focus on her and not the disease.
galdauts|22 days ago
5o1ecist|22 days ago
coffeefirst|22 days ago
Be he’s trying to play oncologist on TV with a cast of AI sidekicks to encourage him. This will not work. It will make him a less effective advocate within the medical system where he needs to focus on engaging experts, and drive him crazy in the meantime.
If the author is reading this, good luck. And fuck cancer.
greazy|22 days ago
It's even more disappointing to see the focus is LLM bullshit. He's not reaching out to current experts in the field to provide his expertise or funding, unfortunately he decided the best approach is, in my opinion, the most ludicrous approach. LLMs can synthesis huge amounts of knowledge, if it's useful a domain expert is using it to its full advantage.
My opinion is that LLMs are trash at generating any useful hypothesis beyond standard single degree ideas that anyone in the field would have.
I'd gladly eat my words. Maybe this post will be looked back on like the Dropbox comment. If LLMs could do such wonders, we would be entering a golden age.
> but you're also not considering what she thinks, feels or wants.
Im doing exactly that! I don't want her to see her partner be consumed by an endless and most likely fruitless quest.
Worst case scenario is what, he spends time with her? Oh the horror.
0815beck|22 days ago
NedF|22 days ago
[deleted]