[hackinthebochs]

>Not only you have shown absolutely zero sources at all to prove the deterministic nature of LLMs to where it can function as a “compiler”

Note that I never defended using LLMs as a compiler. In fact I argued it would be inappropriate. I simply disagreed that the reason is because they are non-deterministic. If you weren't conflating the meaning of deterministic and predictable, you wouldn't keep misreading me.