(no title)
dlubarov | 22 days ago
> "As you probably know I represent the Rothschilds".
What would this have to do with Mossad anyway? It's not surprising that a Jew had some Jewish acquaintances. You probably have Jewish acquaintances too, does that make you a Mossad spy?
Schmerika|22 days ago
Who's 'we'? What's your definition of evidence?
> evidence /ĕv′ĭ-dəns/
> noun
> A thing or set of things helpful in forming a conclusion or judgment.
> "The broken window was evidence that a burglary had taken place. Scientists weighed the evidence for and against the hypothesis."
> Something indicative; an indication or set of indications.
> "saw no evidence of grief on the mourner's face."
> The means by which an allegation may be proven, such as oral testimony, documents, or physical objects.
...
I'd still like you to see you try and answer my questions:
> he [probably] worked for both the US and Israel. Why else would Kash Patel and others have so blatantly lied all this time?
> We know for a near-certain fact that there were compromising tapes on hundreds or thousands of powerful people. Where did they all go?
If you keep ignoring them, it will be hard to imagine that you're arguing in good faith.
dlubarov|22 days ago
But okay, I'll respond to yours -
> he [probably] worked for both the US and Israel. Why else would Kash Patel and others have so blatantly lied all this time?
No idea. That might be evidence of some relationship with the US, not of being a Mossad spy.
> We know for a near-certain fact that there were compromising tapes on hundreds or thousands of powerful people. Where did they all go?
No idea, but even if we assume there was a blackmail scheme (which isn't the only explanation of inappropriate recordings), there's still zero evidence of Mossad involvement.