(no title)
GoatInGrey | 22 days ago
The below captures this perfectly. The author is trying to explain that vibe-coding their own frameworks lets them actually "understand" the code, while not noticing that the LLM-generated text they used to make this point is talking about cutting and sewing bricks.
> But I can do all of this with the experience on my back of having laid the bricks, spread the mortar, cut and sewn for twenty years. If I don’t like something, I can go in, understand it and fix it as I please, instructing once and for all my setup to do what I want next time.
Dfiesl|22 days ago
“ I can be the architect without the wearing act of laying every single brick and spreading the mortar. I can design the dress without the act of cutting and sewing each individual piece of fabric”
To me, this text doesn’t read as being entirely written by an LLM, there is definitely an air of LLM about it though, so maybe the first draft was.
daveguy|22 days ago
potsandpans|22 days ago
Likewise, I think that this mentality is a modern day conversion disorder.
"Everything I don't agree with is an LLM, I have no proof it just feels good!"
cortesoft|22 days ago
GeoAtreides|22 days ago
Correct. The history is rife with examples of manias taking hold of societies, I recommend "Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds" by Charles Mackay[1], it's an absolutely fascinating book.
[1]https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/24518
lstodd|22 days ago
Indeed. Thank you for posting this link.