(no title)
dlubarov | 22 days ago
But okay, I'll respond to yours -
> he [probably] worked for both the US and Israel. Why else would Kash Patel and others have so blatantly lied all this time?
No idea. That might be evidence of some relationship with the US, not of being a Mossad spy.
> We know for a near-certain fact that there were compromising tapes on hundreds or thousands of powerful people. Where did they all go?
No idea, but even if we assume there was a blackmail scheme (which isn't the only explanation of inappropriate recordings), there's still zero evidence of Mossad involvement.
Schmerika|22 days ago
Please, please learn the difference between evidence and proof. There's a lot of evidence, from circumstantial to testimonial to an abundance of hearsay.
Not proof, no. Proof is what follows from investigation - which hasn't happened. Are you familiar with the concept of "the dog that didn't bark"?
> how is a business relationship with a wealthy Jewish family evidence of being a Mossad spy?
Never said it was.
You claimed "This is just false" when my source [2] claimed that he worked for the Rothschilds, and now have moved the goalposts because he said so himself and there's thousands of emails backing that up.
dlubarov|22 days ago
By this absurd definition,
- Sure, Epstein having a Jewish client is evidence of him being a Mossad spy.
- Similarly if you have any Jewish acquaintances, that's evidence of you being a Mossad spy.
- If you've eaten at McDonalds, that means you're not an extreme BDSer, which is evidence of you being a Mossad spy.
- If you know even a couple words of Hebrew, that’s evidence of you being a Mossad spy.
- If you have any encrypted messaging software installed, that’s evidence of you being a Mossad spy.
etc.