[AllegedAlec]

While I'm on the fence about LLMs there's something funny about seeing an industry of technologists tear their own hair out about how technology is destroying their jobs. We're the industry of "we'll automate your job away". Why are we so indignant when we do it to ourselves...

[zamalek]

This article isn't really about losing a job. Coding is a passion for some of us. It's similar to artists and diffusion, the only difference being that many people can appreciate human art - but who (outside of us) cares that a human wrote the code?

[andai]

I love programming, but most of that joy doesn't come from the type of programming I get paid to do. I now have more time and energy for the fun type, and I can go do things that were previously inconceivable!

Last night "I" "made" 3D boids swarm with directional color and perlin noise turbulence. "I" "did" this without knowing how to do the math for any of those things. (My total involvement at the source level was fiddling with the neighbor distance.)

https://jsbin.com/ququzoxete/edit?html,output

Then I turned them into weird proteins

https://jsbin.com/hayominica/edit?html,output

(As a side note, the loss of meaning of "self" and "doing" overlaps weirdly with my meditation practice...)

[SoftTalker]

I think this is really it. Being a musician was never a very reliable way to earn a living, but it was a passion. A genuine expression of talent and feeling through the instrument. And if you were good enough you could pay the bills doing work work for studios, commercials, movies, theater. If you were really good you could perform as a headliner.

Now, AI can generate any kind of music anyone wants, eliminating almost all the anonymous studio, commercial, and soundtrack work. If you're really good you can still perform as a headliner, but (this is a guess) 80% of the work for musicians is just gone.

[crvdgc]

At least for this article it's more about the job, or to be precise, the past where job and passion coincided:

> Ultimately if you have a mortgage and a car payment and a family you love, you’re going to make your decision.

Nothing is preventing the author from continuing to write code by hand and enjoy it. The difference is that people won't necessarily pay for it.

The old way was really incredible (and worth mourning), considering in other industries, how many people can only enjoy what they do outside of work.

[jhickok]

I disagree a bit. Coding can remain an artistic passion for you indefinitely, it's just your ability to demand that everyone crafts each line of code artisinally won't be subsidized by your employer for much longer. There will probably always be a heavily diminished demand for handcrafted code.

[janderland]

The people outside of us didn’t care about your beautiful code before. Now we can quickly build their boring applications and spend more time building beautiful things for our community’s sake. Yes, there are economic concerns, but as far as “craft” goes, nothing is stopping us from continuing to enjoy it.

[mpyne]

> Coding is a passion for some of us.

It's a passion for me too, but LLMs don't change this for me. Do they change it for you?

[ALoverOfLats]

Huge tangent but curiosity is killing me: By any chance is your username based on the Egyptian football club Zamalek?

[kaffekaka]

Is coding a passion only because other people appreciate it?

Is painting a passion because others appreciate it? No, it is a passion in itself.

There will always be people appreciating coding by hand as a passion.

My passions - drawing, writing, coding - are worthwhile in themselves, not because other people care about them. Almost noone does.

[bobro]

How do you read this article and hear indigence? It’s clearly someone grieving something personal about their own relationship with the technology.

[NeutralCrane]

It may not be a reaction to the article itself but to the many comments in this thread and others that fall under that category.

[badc0ffee]

(Indignance, not indigence. Indigence means poverty.)

[boobsbr]

I never thought or felt myself as or my work as someone or something that "will automate your job away".

[EvanAnderson]

Agreed. I've always thought the purpose of all automation was to remove needless toil. I want computers to free people. I guess I subscribe to the theory of creative destruction.

[AstroBen]

I'm very confident in saying the majority of developers didn't get into it saying "we'll automate your job away"

[AllegedAlec]

POSIWID

[ares623]

For me it's because the same tech is doing it to everyone else in a more effective way (i.e. artists especially). I'm an "art enjoyer" since I was a child and to see it decimated by people who I once looked up to is heartbreaking. Also, if it only affected software, I would've been happy to switch to a more artistic career, but welp there goes that plan.

[Melonai]

I feel very similarly, I always thought of software engineering as being my future career. I'm young, I just really got my foot into the industry in my early twenties. It feels like the thing I wanted to do died right when I was allowed to start. I also always felt that if I didn't get to do development, I would try to get into arts which has always been a dream of mine, and now it feels that that died, too. I wish I was born just a little bit earlier, so that I had a bit more time. :(

[jsrcout]

"We" might be such an industry, but I'm not. My focus has always been on creating new capabilities, particularly for specialists in whatever field. I want to make individuals more powerful, not turn them into surplus.

[nilespotter]

Per the "About Me" picture, this particular technologist does not have any hair to tear out.