[gtech1]

My team of 6 people has been building a software to compete with an already established piece of software written by a major software corporation. I'm not saying we'll succeed, I'm not saying we'll be better nor that we will cover every corner case they do and that they learned over the past 30 years. But 6 senior devs are getting stuff done at an insane pace. And if we can _attempt_ to do this, which would have been unthinkable 2 years ago, I can only wonder what will happen next.

[bossyTeacher]

> My team of 6 people has been building a software to compete with an already established piece of software written by a major software corporation.

How long until that the devs at that major corporation start using an LLM? You think your smaller team can still compare to their huge team?

[dpe82]

If the goal is to simply undercut the incumbent with roughly the same product than it doesn't really matter if the incumbent starts using LLMs too as their cost structure, margin expectations, etc. are already relatively set.

[henry2023]

Of course they can. if you’ve ever stepped a foot inside big tech you’ll know the bottle neck is not dev output.

[josephg]

Yeah I’m curious how much the moat of big software companies will shrink over the next few years. How long before I can ask a chatbot to build me a windows-like OS from scratch (complete with an office suite) and it can do a reasonable job?

And what happens then? Will we stop using each others code?