top | item 46930383 (no title) Yokohiii | 23 days ago That's an odd opinion about a language with a lot of class related features. I can only assume you have a very strong definition of OOP. discuss order hn newest direwolf20|23 days ago OOP doesn't mean that your language has a "class" keyword, nor dot notation for calling functions. afiori|23 days ago I enjoyed the pragmatic historical definition of OOP given in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wo84LFzx5nI where essential it can be seen as subtype polymorphism
direwolf20|23 days ago OOP doesn't mean that your language has a "class" keyword, nor dot notation for calling functions. afiori|23 days ago I enjoyed the pragmatic historical definition of OOP given in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wo84LFzx5nI where essential it can be seen as subtype polymorphism
afiori|23 days ago I enjoyed the pragmatic historical definition of OOP given in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wo84LFzx5nI where essential it can be seen as subtype polymorphism
direwolf20|23 days ago
afiori|23 days ago