top | item 46933196

(no title)

abcd_f | 21 days ago

I read through the RFC and I think it's fair it was rejected, because this was ultimately a half-measure, with severe usability restrictions.

Fat pointers are clearly a way to deal with arrays (and also get "slices" and non-zero terminated strings for free!), but it's just not possible to retrofit them into the language without breaking existing code.

discuss

order

No comments yet.