(no title)
abcde666777 | 21 days ago
To me the claim of the article was silly on the surface of it, silly enough that I was surprised that folks consider it worthy of discussion.
Is there just a large number of upvoters here without even a basic understanding of the topic at hand? Or is there some other explanation beyond that?
bonoboTP|21 days ago
Edit: I notice I'm talking to a 2 week old account, I should've checked before engaging.