[AnotherGoodName]

Pick any number that's not 4 and repeat it twice. For the next 2 after that pick any number that's not that previous number and repeat it twice. So on.

It's not like i had any difficulty coming up with that sequence i wrote to that point.

1 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 5 5 6 6 8 1 2... as an example of how trivial it is to continue to this.

I get that if you limit yourself to '1' or '2' you force the choice of next number but even then there's two possibilities of this sequence (start on 1 vs start on 2).

[flufluflufluffy]

I guess you could say the Kolakoski sequence is special in being the “simplest” version of such a sequence (ignoring the finite trivial case {1} xD)

[MontyCarloHall]

You are still choosing random numbers here. The Kolakoski sequence has zero randomness whatsoever.

[AnotherGoodName]

Do we care similarly about the version of this that starts on 2?

2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2...

2, 2, 1, 1,

Again no randomness. Just a variant of the above and trivial to continue this.