(no title)
EliRivers | 21 days ago
They can not. They can make some average code. On Friday one suggested an NSI installer script that would never bundle some needed files in the actual installer. I can only imagine that a lot of people have made the same mistake (used CopyFiles instead of File) and posted that mistake on the internet. The true disaster of that being that then testing out that installer on the developer's PC, where that CopyFiles may well work fine since the needed files happen to be sitting on that PC, would then lead on to think it was some weird bug that only failed on the end user's PC. I bet a lot of people posted it with comments like "this worked fine when I tried it," and here we are a decade later feeding that to an LLM.
These tools can write average code. That's what they've mostly been fed; that's what they're aiming for when they do their number crunching. The more specifically one prompts, I expect, then the more acceptable that average code will be. In some cases, average appears to be shockingly bad (actually, based on a couple of decades' experience in the game, average is generally pretty bad - I surely must have been churning out some average, bad code twenty years ago). If I want better than average, I'm going to have to do it myself.
pojzon|21 days ago
It still cuts out 40-50% of workforce out.
For above average engineers its very good.
For bottom half not so much.
Translate for Mgrs - it replaces offshore completely.
EliRivers|21 days ago
geon|21 days ago
The juniors can't be replaced because all senior engineer were once junior.
The non-programmers won't be replaced because they are not really programmers to begin with, so there is nothing to replace.
thallium205|21 days ago
unknown|21 days ago
[deleted]
MattRix|21 days ago
It doesn’t matter if you don’t think it’s good yet, because it’s brand new tech and it keeps improving.
Anamon|20 days ago