[pertymcpert]

I have a feeling that you didn't because if you had, you'd realize it has more similarity to llvm than gcc.

[mdavid626]

Not sure who are you replying to. But me, personally, never said anything about gcc, nor llvm.

[pertymcpert]

> I have a feeling, you didn't look at the code at all.

And you originally asked how someone knew that they weren't just spitting out gcc. So you reject their statement that it's not like gcc at all with your "you didn't look at the code at all". When its clear that you haven't looked at it.