[tapoxi]

Is it really that much better than alternatives to justify these constant outages?

[dsagent]

We're starting to have that convo in our org. This is just getting worse and worse for Github.

Hosting .git is not that complicated of a problem in isolation.

[bigfishrunning]

No, but it has momentum left over from when it was much better. The Microsoft downslide will continue untill there's no one left

[jeltz]

Not any longer. It used to but the outages have become very common. I am thinking about moving all my personal stuff to Codeberg.

[shimman]

Yes, for personal projects I just self-host an instance of forgejo with dokploy. Everything else I deploy on codeberg, which is also an instance of forgejo.

[riffic]

self-host your own services. There are a lot of alternatives to GitHub.

[tacker2000]

Im using Bitbucket for years with no issues.

[onraglanroad]

The great advantage of Bitbucket is that it's so painfully slow you can't tell if it's down or not.

[rvz]

It always has been to just self host. Predicted GitHub's outage streak as far back as half a decade ago [0].

"A better way is to self host". [0]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22867803

[vvilliamperez]

You can self-host GitHub enterprise.

[poilet66]

Ooh - got a source?

[azangru]

I love its UI (apart from its slowness, of course). I find it much cleaner than Gitlab's.