top | item 46947677

(no title)

DesiLurker | 20 days ago

makes me wonder what if I just wanted to sync with nfc every once in a while. wifi seems overkill for this. maybe it could be done much cheaper with nfc sync witha phone twice a year?

discuss

order

phh|20 days ago

An ESP32-C3 Super Mini can be found for below 3$ (cheapest I had was 1.58€). Since the original clock is 3.88$, it can't be that much cheaper.

pantalaimon|20 days ago

You often have a radio clock source like DCF77 that all those radio controlled clocks use

yjftsjthsd-h|20 days ago

ESPs are so cheap that you couldn't possibly save very much money, and the way economies of scale work it may or may not be cheaper to use NFC anyways.

sowbug|20 days ago

We've been shopping for a simple bathroom clock to replace our final Amazon Echo and leave that increasingly dystopian ecosystem. There are some models that use Bluetooth on your phone to sync the time. I could imagine BLE being a good low-power and relatively stateless solution. But given our goals, we're not going to install an app on a phone just to maintain a wall clock. (I'd be fine if Android provided BLE time sync as a built-in service.)

russdill|20 days ago

Home assistant has pretty good BLE capabilities. But honestly, as has already been pointed out wifi is already really cheap.