[panny]

If you're having children you can't afford, you are irresponsible. That is simple and easy for anyone to understand. If you then take your irresponsiblity and pay for it with the tax money of responsible people, you're rewarding the irresponsible people and punishing the responsible ones.

The part where I didn't have children I couldn't afford is what makes it particularly galling. I gave up something and they didn't, but I'm punished and they are rewarded.

[tapoxi]

This is an account for the child once they turn 18. This is not money for the parents.

[unsnap_biceps]

It appears that it's limited even after 18.

    After the growth period (that is, starting January 1st of the calendar year in which the child turns 18), most of the rules that apply to traditional IRAs will generally apply to the Trump account. For example, this means that distributions from the Trump account could be subject to the section 72(t) 10% additional tax on early distributions, unless an exception applies with respect to the child (such as for distributions for higher education expenses or first home purchases).

https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i4547

[GeorgeOldfield]

fine but the tradeoff is you are not getting any benefits or services from people younger than you. deal or no deal?

[panny]

>You will not be allowed to have goods and services if you don't give me your money which you would need to buy goods and services.

Either way you steal the goods and services from me. Not only immoral, but self-entitled about it. Disgusting.