top | item 46956056 (no title) epgui | 20 days ago Yeah no, that criticism of Haskell is nonsense. discuss order hn newest stingraycharles|20 days ago It wasn’t intended as criticism of Haskell at all, I love that language. I have a whole bunch of open source Haskell projects under my name.It was intended as a criticism of the article, that its whole assumption “FP == making invalid states impossible to represent” is incorrect.I recognize that it’s very much possible to embrace chaos with Haskell, and I should probably have worded that better.
stingraycharles|20 days ago It wasn’t intended as criticism of Haskell at all, I love that language. I have a whole bunch of open source Haskell projects under my name.It was intended as a criticism of the article, that its whole assumption “FP == making invalid states impossible to represent” is incorrect.I recognize that it’s very much possible to embrace chaos with Haskell, and I should probably have worded that better.
stingraycharles|20 days ago
It was intended as a criticism of the article, that its whole assumption “FP == making invalid states impossible to represent” is incorrect.
I recognize that it’s very much possible to embrace chaos with Haskell, and I should probably have worded that better.