That's not even close to what "wiki" means. Couldn't you have spent two seconds looking up the term that you're using (a community-owned content/knowledge graph that's "collaboratively edited and managed by its audience directly through a web browser") before debasing it?
You've confused "wiki" and "encyclopedia"—getting them exactly backwards. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that's a wiki.
You're creating (or, at least, aiming to create) an online encyclopedia. But it's not a wiki.
"Wiki" normally refers to user-editable sites, while the graph part is normally implied from being a website. Perhaps Wiregraph would be more accurate? Maybe Wireview? These kinds of networking sites are often called looking glasses, so Wireglass might also work, besides the confusion with the material.
cxr|18 days ago
You've confused "wiki" and "encyclopedia"—getting them exactly backwards. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that's a wiki.
You're creating (or, at least, aiming to create) an online encyclopedia. But it's not a wiki.
mzajc|19 days ago
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki#Alternative_definitions
[1]: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wiki