[likium]

At least for the real life pictures, there’s no depth of field. Everything is crystal clear like it’s composited.

[derefr]

> like its composited

Like focus stacking, specifically.

I’m always surprised when people bother to point out more-subtle flaws in AI images as “tells”, when the “depth-of-field problem” is so easily spotted, and has been there in every AI image ever since the earliest models.

[Mashimo]

I had no problems getting images with blurry background with the appropriate prompts. Something like "shallow depth of fields, bokeh, DSLR" can lead to good results. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1180506623475720222/1... [0]

But I found that that results in more professional looking images, and not more realistic photos.

Adding something like "selfy, Instagram, low resolution, flash" can lead to a .. worse image that looks more realistic.

[0] I think I did this one with z image turbo on my 4060 ti

[vunderba]

Which is pretty amusing - because it's the exact opposite problem that BFL had with the original Flux model - every single image looked like it was taken with a 200mm f/4.

[albumen]

Every photoreal image on the demo page has depth of field, it’s just subtle.