[JohnHammersley]

This is such a well written story, and congratulations Ben, it sounds like it's been a lot of hard but ultimately successful work!

I know you'll deservedly get a lot of credit for all your work in remastering the game, but you should also get credit for how you've woven this narrative together, it's a lovely read. Thank you for taking the time to write it up, and good luck with the Steam release, and whatever project you take on next! :)

[benstopics]

Thank you sir and I'm glad you enjoyed the story! I hope it's successful but we will see.

[sho_hn]

I really enjoyed this article as well!

I'm still curious, however:

> That's not a marketing angle—it's a headline that writes itself.

Any ChatGPT assistance there?

[Aloha]

I'm only annoyed that I cant buy it right now!

[teiferer]

> This is such a well written story, [...] you should also get credit for how you've woven this narrative together, it's a lovely read.

Don't forget to give credit to the LLM too which wrote the story for him.

[benstopics]

Sure, it's 2026 I used Claude to write a lot of it. But tell me this. Do you know which paragraphs I wrote?

[SeanDav]

I.Don't.Care.

I enjoyed the narrative. It was true. Who cares if it was written by a ghost writer, an AI or anything else.

[dmos62]

Thankfully you came up with this pulitzer prize of a comment all on your own, didn't you?

[stavros]

Can we stop with this? The world has changed, LLMs exist, people use them, and "omg LLMs" is a very tired trope now. If you didn't like the article, you can critique it, but "you used a tool I don't like" is just boring.