[jrjeksjd8d]

> That said - we have never seen this many LLM agents (150,000 atm!) wired up via a global, persistent, agent-first scratchpad

Once again LLM defenders fall back on "lots of AI" as a success metric. Is the AI useful? No, but we have a lot of it! This is like companies forcing LLM coding adoption by tracking token use.

> But it's also true that we are well into uncharted territory with bleeding edge automations that we barely even understand individually, let alone a network there of reaching in numbers possibly into ~millions

"If number go up, emergent behaviour?" is not a compelling excuse to me. Karpathy is absolutely high on his own supply trying to hype this bubble.

[aleph_minus_one]

You interpret claims into Karpathy's tweets that in my opinion are not there in the original text.

[naasking]

> Once again LLM defenders fall back on "lots of AI" as a success metric.

That's not implied by anything he said. He simply said that it was fascinating, and he's right.