You’ve described a technology, not a solution to a clearly articulated problem that customers actually have. The problem that you have described is vague, and it’s unclear that it’s actually a problem at all. Finally, you don’t provide a persuasive and concrete argument about how your eventual solution—whatever that may be—will solve it.
I don’t mean to be so presumptuous as to teach Grampa how to suck eggs, but I think Amazon’s working backwards process is instructive.
Hey, is JJ compatibility in the cards? Considering the blog article hints at a goal of a developerless agent-to-agent automation platform I'm guessing developer conveniences are a side quest rn?
ashtom|21 days ago
otterley|20 days ago
I don’t mean to be so presumptuous as to teach Grampa how to suck eggs, but I think Amazon’s working backwards process is instructive.
sp4cec0wb0y|21 days ago
Hammershaft|20 days ago
booleandilemma|21 days ago
harladsinsteden|21 days ago
dang|20 days ago
You may not owe ex-Github-CEOs better, but you owe this community better if you're participating in it.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
az226|20 days ago
[deleted]