top | item 46966742 (no title) jrwr | 20 days ago What a bad name for a webmail client discuss order hn newest sam_goody|20 days ago That's a blunt way of saying it, but I agree with the sentiment.Which is a shame, because this is a project that could have had potential, but a poor name goes a long way towards discouraging it being taken seriously. jrm4|20 days ago Have we learned nothing from GIMP? No, no we have not. load replies (1) benj111|19 days ago Well you're saying that from not just an Anglo centric pov but a US pov. 'Cockly' doesn't sound particularly bad to my British ears.But then I live not so far from Penistone, so maybe I'm just used to these kind of naming schemes.
sam_goody|20 days ago That's a blunt way of saying it, but I agree with the sentiment.Which is a shame, because this is a project that could have had potential, but a poor name goes a long way towards discouraging it being taken seriously. jrm4|20 days ago Have we learned nothing from GIMP? No, no we have not. load replies (1)
benj111|19 days ago Well you're saying that from not just an Anglo centric pov but a US pov. 'Cockly' doesn't sound particularly bad to my British ears.But then I live not so far from Penistone, so maybe I'm just used to these kind of naming schemes.
sam_goody|20 days ago
Which is a shame, because this is a project that could have had potential, but a poor name goes a long way towards discouraging it being taken seriously.
jrm4|20 days ago
benj111|19 days ago
But then I live not so far from Penistone, so maybe I'm just used to these kind of naming schemes.