[beoberha]

Ignoring the VC economics and awful name, I won’t be as pessimistic as everyone. I see the vision.

That said, nobody knows what the AI future looks like. Entire’s entire thesis is a solution for something we don’t even know we need. It’s a massive bet and uphill battle. Traditionally, dev tool success stories come from grassroots projects of developers solving their own problems and not massive VC funded efforts that tell you what you need to do.

[ryan_n]

I feel like it says a lot if this is the not pessimistic take.

[beoberha]

My pessimism is mostly rooted in the VC economics of it all. The vision is great, but its a busy space and there's no actual product or business. They basically wrote the guy a check to build the spaceship in space.

[alansaber]

I actually feel like the LLM-driven AI future is relatively forseeable. It's only if we get a new, cooler architecture that we'll see a fundamental change to what we've kind of known for a while now

[ttul]

And yet, this is precisely what seed bets are about. You have to try it in order to know whether there is a "there" there.

[ushakov]

$1.5M seed bets, maybe. not $60M though