top | item 46970885 (no title) altcognito | 18 days ago The question isn't whether or not we have vaccines, it is whether or not we have the most effective vaccines. discuss order hn newest alex43578|18 days ago It’s a good thing the specific criticism of this trial is that they didn’t use the most effective vaccine for 65+ people, since you’re concerned about having the most effective vaccines. altcognito|17 days ago How do you know if you don’t do a study?You can call anything a criticism, but it doesn’t make it true. watwut|18 days ago So, the majority of us, people under 65 are completely unaffected. And yes, the vaccine can be approved for 65- while not approved for 65+. load replies (1)
alex43578|18 days ago It’s a good thing the specific criticism of this trial is that they didn’t use the most effective vaccine for 65+ people, since you’re concerned about having the most effective vaccines. altcognito|17 days ago How do you know if you don’t do a study?You can call anything a criticism, but it doesn’t make it true. watwut|18 days ago So, the majority of us, people under 65 are completely unaffected. And yes, the vaccine can be approved for 65- while not approved for 65+. load replies (1)
altcognito|17 days ago How do you know if you don’t do a study?You can call anything a criticism, but it doesn’t make it true.
watwut|18 days ago So, the majority of us, people under 65 are completely unaffected. And yes, the vaccine can be approved for 65- while not approved for 65+. load replies (1)
alex43578|18 days ago
altcognito|17 days ago
You can call anything a criticism, but it doesn’t make it true.
watwut|18 days ago