top | item 46972483

(no title)

sksksk | 19 days ago

What I've observed, is that 90% of journeys people make can be done without a car.

Designing a city that helps people make those journeys car free, makes it better for the 10% of journeys that do need to be made with a car.

discuss

order

bobby322|18 days ago

Can and want to or being efficient are different things. I "can" travel around in a city using public transport with 3 kids and all their sporting equipment, do I want to, no. Would any sane person want to? No.

morsch|18 days ago

Maybe consider a sports club that's in walking -- or cycling -- distance. But I guess that's also insane.

Unless you're going surfing, 3 kids and their sporting equipment fit in a small hatchback, with room to spare.

sksksk|18 days ago

That’s a bit of a strawman argument. Most journeys don’t consist of three children and all their sporting equipment.

As a practical example, in the UK, on average a young g child lives 1.7miles away from their school.

That is an easily walkable distance for most children, yet lots of parents choose to drive it because they feel the streets aren’t safe to walk on in rush hour.

If by redesigning streets to make active travel more appealing, you could reduce the number of cars on the school run by 10%; it would improve the traffic situation for the ones who still need to drive. Win-win