top | item 46977987 (no title) karolist | 18 days ago The amount of times benchmarks of competitors said something is close to Claude and it was remotely close in practice in the past year: 0 discuss order hn newest ionelaipatioaei|18 days ago I honestly feel like people are brainwashed by anthropic propaganda when it comes to claude, I think codex is just way better and kimi 2.5 (and I think glm 5 now) are perfectly fine for a claude replacement. mark_l_watson|18 days ago So much money is on the line for US super scalers that they probably pay for ‘pushes’ on social media. Maybe Chinese companies are doing the same. load replies (1) sumedh|18 days ago > I think codex is just way betterCodex was super slow till 5.2 codex. Claude models were noticeably faster.
ionelaipatioaei|18 days ago I honestly feel like people are brainwashed by anthropic propaganda when it comes to claude, I think codex is just way better and kimi 2.5 (and I think glm 5 now) are perfectly fine for a claude replacement. mark_l_watson|18 days ago So much money is on the line for US super scalers that they probably pay for ‘pushes’ on social media. Maybe Chinese companies are doing the same. load replies (1) sumedh|18 days ago > I think codex is just way betterCodex was super slow till 5.2 codex. Claude models were noticeably faster.
mark_l_watson|18 days ago So much money is on the line for US super scalers that they probably pay for ‘pushes’ on social media. Maybe Chinese companies are doing the same. load replies (1)
sumedh|18 days ago > I think codex is just way betterCodex was super slow till 5.2 codex. Claude models were noticeably faster.
ionelaipatioaei|18 days ago
mark_l_watson|18 days ago
sumedh|18 days ago
Codex was super slow till 5.2 codex. Claude models were noticeably faster.