top | item 46981791 (no title) chrisrogers | 19 days ago My read is that it's immoral because it's a surveillance hijack without the knowledge of the users, as opposed to an opt-in. discuss order hn newest whattheheckheck|19 days ago And its not just opt in for the camera owner/licensor it should be explicitly optin for anyone who gets recorded loeg|19 days ago In the US, you don't have an expectation of privacy in public places. load replies (1)
whattheheckheck|19 days ago And its not just opt in for the camera owner/licensor it should be explicitly optin for anyone who gets recorded loeg|19 days ago In the US, you don't have an expectation of privacy in public places. load replies (1)
loeg|19 days ago In the US, you don't have an expectation of privacy in public places. load replies (1)
whattheheckheck|19 days ago
loeg|19 days ago