(no title)
ergocoder | 18 days ago
Scholarships and this kind of funds happen elsewhere and are based on merits. They end up funding a bunch of upper middle class's children because it turns out those children are well-equipped to perform higher on merits.
If you are too rich, then you wouldn't need this kind of fund.
If you are below upper middle class, then you would have a hard time competing with children from that class.
The upper middle class isn't rich enough to fund the kid but is good enough to accumulate a lot of merits.
arexxbifs|18 days ago
While I'm sure there are some wholly self-made virtuosos on the list, it does give off an air of apparent nepotism.
RobotToaster|18 days ago
I'd argue they are well equipped to give the appearance of merit, rather than performing higher on actual merit.
ergocoder|18 days ago
We can easily look at countries like Vietnam and Thailand where the merit is basically exam-based. Extremely difficult to cheat or "give the appearance".
The upper middle class's children perform very well. The top universities are full of these children. They are the top of the country. They are math/computer/science olympiads
If you are too rich, then the children are too spoiled. If you are too poor, then you don't have time and space to study nor access to private tutors.