[ahofmann]

Em dashes are used often by LLMs, because humans use them often. On mac keyboards its easily typed. I know this is oversimplifying the situation, but I don't see the usefulness of the constant witch-hunting for allegedly LLM-generated text. For text we are long beyond the point, where we can differenciate between human generated and machine generated. We're even at the point, where it gets somewhat hard to identify machine generated audio and visuals.

[StilesCrisis]

I might not be able to spot ALL AI generated text, but I can definitely spot some. It's still kind of quirky.

[dTal]

LLM output has its quirks, but human output can be much quirkier. To me, the most obvious tell of AI is a lack of quirks.

[vardalab]

Yeah, I agree with you. I'm so tired of people complaining about AI-generated text without focusing on the content. Just don't read it if you don't like it. It's another level of when people complain how a website is not readable for them or some CSS rendering is wrong or whatever. How does it add to the discussion?

[JSR_FDED]

The problem is that there’s infinite “content” out there.

The amount of work the author puts in is correlated with the value of the piece (insight/novelty/etc). AI-written text is a signal that there’s less less effort and therefore less value there.

It’s not a perfect correlation and there are lots of exceptions like foreign language speakers, but it is a signal.