top | item 46991386 (no title) viktorcode | 17 days ago LoC is a good code quality metric, only it has to be inverted. Not "it wrote C compiler in 100 000 lines of code", but "in just 2000 lines of code". Now that is impressive and deserves praise. discuss order hn newest Kerrick|17 days ago I don't want to maintain an information system written in the style of code golf competitions, either.I like the author's proposed "Comprehension coverage" metric. It aligns well with Naur's Programming as Theory Building. prepend|17 days ago Not necessarily.If I minimize my project and get everything on one line, is that good? I think not.Measuring success based on how may or how few lines there are is a bad idea, I think. hamuraijack|17 days ago this is also easily gameable. Any language can easily be converted into a single LOC
Kerrick|17 days ago I don't want to maintain an information system written in the style of code golf competitions, either.I like the author's proposed "Comprehension coverage" metric. It aligns well with Naur's Programming as Theory Building.
prepend|17 days ago Not necessarily.If I minimize my project and get everything on one line, is that good? I think not.Measuring success based on how may or how few lines there are is a bad idea, I think.
hamuraijack|17 days ago this is also easily gameable. Any language can easily be converted into a single LOC
Kerrick|17 days ago
I like the author's proposed "Comprehension coverage" metric. It aligns well with Naur's Programming as Theory Building.
prepend|17 days ago
If I minimize my project and get everything on one line, is that good? I think not.
Measuring success based on how may or how few lines there are is a bad idea, I think.
hamuraijack|17 days ago