(no title)
Alupis | 17 days ago
That is to say there is no 200% tariff on cups.
[1] - https://www.fedex.com/en-us/ancillary-clearance-service.html
Alupis | 17 days ago
That is to say there is no 200% tariff on cups.
[1] - https://www.fedex.com/en-us/ancillary-clearance-service.html
mindslight|17 days ago
So in this case an American is still paying for the misguided close-the-barn-door-after-the-horse-ran-out policy, just with most going directly to the corporate interests that helped install this corrupt administration.
(but the joke is on them - Aliexpress Choice doesn't charge brokerage fees)
Alupis|17 days ago
Tariffs are designed to change consumer spending habits, and force international businesses to create on-shore operations. To that end, they are effective - but it takes longer than 365 days for those patterns to shift.
> misguided close-the-barn-door-after-the-horse-ran-out policy
> helped install this corrupt administration
I dare say your opinion, here, has nothing to do with the efficacy of tariffs. Tariffs have long been studied, and both major political parties have called for tariffs like we're seeing right now at various points in recent history. The only difference is nobody desired to rock the status quo, so the lopsided economic policies of the past persisted.
Nearly every other nation tariffs American goods in some way. American businesses attempting to sell products into Brazil, the UK, Germany and more are - and have been - at a significant disadvantage for decades due to high import taxes and duties. For the first time those international businesses are feeling the same consequences as their own nation's weaponized economic policies. Perhaps that will put pressure on their governments, achieving the ultimate goal of the USA's policy - reduce and/or remove tariffs across the board. ie. Fair Trade vs. Free Trade.
tracerbulletx|17 days ago