(no title)
nohat | 18 days ago
As a bit of an explanation I generated these before Nano banana pro came out, and at the time I made a large comparison grid for various image and text models. For this style qwen image performed very well. LLM wise I started with 5.1 and updated to 5.2. Of course with the rate of model release my choices are pretty much already obsolete... Expense is also a factor for a hobby project, and NB pro is 7.5x more expensive than Qwen image.
vunderba|18 days ago
And of course, we should see Qwen-Image 2.0 become open-weight in 4-6 weeks as well - so good things on the horizon!
nohat|17 days ago