[gowthamgts12]

How low we have become to do nothing about it? No arrests no convictions?

[protocolture]

What do you mean?

I understand the reporting is like "LOOK AT ALL THESE CRIMES" but the files themselves are stuff like "Tee hee I know some girls for you".

How do you get from that to an arrest or conviction? If you unredacted that person, identified them and called them would they tell you that the girls were all 18 or older? Or would they incriminate themselves? Do you know it hasn't already been followed up on?

I honestly dont understand what people are expecting here.

[an0malous]

> How do you get from that to an arrest or conviction?

You do an investigation

> Do you know it hasn't already been followed up on?

Yes because that would be a part of these files. It’s not disputed that at minimum any leads, including victim testimonies, were not followed up.

[rpdillon]

Just some examples. If you watch the hearings from two days ago, you'll see that DOJ refuses to interview or speak to the victims to gather more info, and ignored a report from DJT's limo driver that he spoke with a (now deceased) victim that was murdered (head blown off, cops said it couldn't be suicide). That report asserts that DJT and JEE raped her, but they never even spoke to him or followed up.

There is a clear pattern of inaction, going back several administrations.

[thefz]

In the files there are scanned documents from the FBI reporting direct testimony from the victims of rape, violence, murder from prominent politicians, bankers, et cetera.

Start with... investigating that?

Ask them: why this person should be going around telling people you raped her? Have you ever met?

You know, like law enforcement does when there is the suspect of a crime.

[anechouapechou]

>>but the files themselves are stuff like "Tee hee I know some girls for you".

Really? Like the multiple "thank you for the pizza" e-mails which the sender was censored, or the whole obsession they have around "jerky" and how to cook jerky, "walk the jerky", or when it was mentioned that Epstein would eat less jerky because he was having some intestinal issues? Even mentioning these things, it still is such a small portion of all the sick shit that is on the files, pictures with literal children, a video of Epstein using a magnifying glass to burn a woman, and you're literally calling it a nothingburger?

[stolen_biscuit]

> I honestly dont understand what people are expecting here.

An investigation...?

[asdff]

Pam Bondi said if the DOJ went after everyone the whole system would collapse is why.

[colecut]

Actually, no she didn't, but a lot of people are saying she did.

[deadbolt]

If that's the case, the system deserves to.

[doodlebugging]

She is more worried about her own exposure. She can picture the ship sinking but doesn't want to drown with the other rats she helped protect.

[O1111OOO]

> Pam Bondi said if the DOJ went after everyone the whole system would collapse is why.

This is a criminally colluding Pam Bondi saying this. I guarantee that every single person on the Epstein list is replaceable many times over. There is not a single person on that list that is indispensable in any role they play in society. Full stop. Don't fall for it.

It's just the way the system is built. Even Pam Bondi is replaceable (and should be replaced) by many, many actual qualified people.

[Herring]

> the whole system

If there were democrats on that list, they’d already be in jail.

[ekianjo]

Pam Bondi is trying to play the clock until the hot potato falls in someone else's hands.

[lolive]

Save the Borgias !

[BLKNSLVR]

So she admitted that the whole system is corrupt?