[that_guy_iain]

> You don't have the right to complain to random websites without punishment. And nobody punished you. And "ability to redress" is something you still have. And there are no damages.

Well, you see Dang aka Daniel edited the settings on my account to stop me replying, or that's what I've heard, and pointing out the absolute lie that the blog post is. And that did hamper my ability to redress and people have been lying about me so there are damages. But even if it's just rate limiting that hampers my ability especially since it's been optimised heavily for high traffic so there is no technical reason for it since it's a file-based datastore.

> You brought it up. Though it's pretty obvious you're a liar.

I said someone there should know. I didn't say everyone should know. I clearly made it quite clear it was insider knowledge. This is what is known as a flex. I want to tell you my tagline because it's awesome but you can just call me a keyboard warrior.

[Dylan16807]

I thought the problem was inability to edit, now it's inability to reply? Also you're wrong about the post and you don't know what damages are and your flex failed real bad. Good luck in life.

And nobody ever has to let you post on their private website. Right to redress is unrelated. If you take away anything from this conversation, please let it be that.