(no title)
alfonsodev | 16 days ago
I refuse to get contaminated with this speech pattern, so I try to rephrase when needed to say what it is, not what is not and then what it is, if that makes sense.
Some examples in the AI rant :
> Not because it was wrong. Not because it broke anything. Not because the code was bad.
> This isn’t about quality. This isn’t about learning. This is about control.
> This isn’t just about one closed PR. It’s about the future of AI-assisted development.
Probably there are more, and I start feeling like an old person when people talk to me like this and I complain, to then refuse to continue the conversation, but I feel like I'm the grumpy asshole.
It's not about AI changing how we talk, it's about the cringe that it produces and the suspicion that the speech was AI generated. ( this one was on propose )
alibarber|16 days ago
Or simply zone out if it’s someone actually talking.
cheesepaint|16 days ago
But I could be wrong, I am from a non-English speaking country, where everybody around me has English as a second language. I assume that patterns like this would take longer to grow in my environment than in an English-speaking environment.
Revanche1367|16 days ago
nxobject|16 days ago
sigbottle|16 days ago
But like, all of these statements are basically ampliative statements, to make it more grand and even more ambiguous.
Dfiesl|16 days ago
bruce343434|16 days ago