(no title)
throwaway5752 | 16 days ago
Then they tried to baselessly blame DEI, then they tried to shift blame to the controller.
The collision was January 29. On Jan 20, a hiring freeze was hastily rolled out including the FAA. They were in the process of laying off staff, which was finalized in February with 400 probationary staff. These were largely rolled back that year after the impact to the civil aviation system, including substantially contributing to the deaths of these 67 people. The NIST report was produced under pressure. I stand by what I wrote. They threw an overloaded system into chaos with little care for the consequences and this was one of the results.
DOGE was working hand in hand with then new administration the entire time.
rogerrogerr|16 days ago
You list some facts, but they are not connected to the incident in a causal way.
throwaway5752|16 days ago
I did list facts. And I agree with your causal analysis. I simply disagree with your interpretation of the degree to which the contributing factors we responsible. This is not my words as someone on the internet, this is the NTSB report's contributing factors.
If a shipping company immediately changed policy to force drivers to work 18 hours a day and 7 days a week, then it would be a pretty poor analysis to chalk all the resulting accidents up to driver error. Driver error would be the actual cause, the negligent policy change would be a proximate cause.
I respect your expertise in the area as a pilot but I will stand by what I have said. And I respectfully have said all I have to say on the matter.
ExpertAdvisor01|16 days ago
ExpertAdvisor01|16 days ago