[ai-x]

There should be two separate lines of products. One in which privacy is priority and adheres to government regulations (around privacy) and probably costs 2x and one with zero government intervention (around privacy) which costs less and time-to-market is faster.

I don't want a few irrationally paranoid people bottlenecking progress and access to the latest technology and innovation.

I'm happy to broadcast my brainwaves on an open YouTube channel for the ZERO people who are interested in it.

[drnick1]

> I don't want a few irrationally paranoid people bottlenecking progress and access to the latest technology and innovation.

Paranoid? Is there not enough evidence posted almost daily on HN that tech companies are constantly spying on their users through computers, Internet-of-Shit devices, phones, cars and even washing machines? You might not care about the brainwave data specifically, but there is bound to be information on your devices that you expect remains private.

Things have become so bad that I now refuse to use computers that don't run a DIY Linux distro like Arch that allows users to decide what goes into their system. My phone runs GrapheneOS because Google and Apple can't be trusted. I self host email and other "cloud" services for the same reason.

[ai-x]

Yes, it's paranoid. All those things has ZERO effect on me.

But, here's the worst part, paranoid people are *always* going to be paranoid and take elaborate steps and second-guess everything and everyone, while the rest of the population are happy to hand data and enjoy their lives

[tgv]

Explain how sending EEG recordings is progress. And why faster access to the latest tech is always good, for everyone.

[ai-x]

It's about regulatory burdens on the innovators.

[selkin]

otoh: the non regulated should cost more.

It’s kinda like “qualified investors” - you want to make sure people who are wiling to do something extremely stupid can afford it and acknowledge their stupidity.

We don’t need regulation to protect those that can afford to buy protection: we need it for those who can’t.

[ai-x]

Only if it has negative externalities.