top | item 47017690 (no title) aniviacat | 15 days ago Do you know why it was rejected? discuss order hn newest latexr|15 days ago It’s been too long, I no longer recall specifics. Wikipedia links to the patch’s discussion on Google Groups, if you care to read it.https://groups.google.com/g/vim_dev/c/65jjGqS1_VQ/m/fFiFrrIB...Vim 8 did add support for asynchronous jobs, due to the pressure of Neovim fork.https://lwn.net/Articles/713114/ mos87|13 days ago And did so in its (or rather Bram's) own, incompatible with Neovim way. I imagine that's the biggest problem with Vim why Neovim was even created - hardcore NIH syndrome of Vim's main author. worldsavior|15 days ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7279358 mos87|13 days ago Some good context...
latexr|15 days ago It’s been too long, I no longer recall specifics. Wikipedia links to the patch’s discussion on Google Groups, if you care to read it.https://groups.google.com/g/vim_dev/c/65jjGqS1_VQ/m/fFiFrrIB...Vim 8 did add support for asynchronous jobs, due to the pressure of Neovim fork.https://lwn.net/Articles/713114/ mos87|13 days ago And did so in its (or rather Bram's) own, incompatible with Neovim way. I imagine that's the biggest problem with Vim why Neovim was even created - hardcore NIH syndrome of Vim's main author.
mos87|13 days ago And did so in its (or rather Bram's) own, incompatible with Neovim way. I imagine that's the biggest problem with Vim why Neovim was even created - hardcore NIH syndrome of Vim's main author.
worldsavior|15 days ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7279358 mos87|13 days ago Some good context...
latexr|15 days ago
https://groups.google.com/g/vim_dev/c/65jjGqS1_VQ/m/fFiFrrIB...
Vim 8 did add support for asynchronous jobs, due to the pressure of Neovim fork.
https://lwn.net/Articles/713114/
mos87|13 days ago
worldsavior|15 days ago
mos87|13 days ago