top | item 47019200

(no title)

turzmo | 15 days ago

I see, so no substance behind your argument.

discuss

order

refulgentis|15 days ago

Your claim is:

“I fully believe that ChatGPT did the work they say it did, but that it deserves about as much credit as Mathematica does in "deriving a new result".”

The only thing you said is arguable is whether it deserves about as much credit as Mathematica.

I provided 3 prongs as to why I believe that is untrue, put $1000 up for you to show it is true, you replied with more bullying. Your loss, $1000 was more than generous.