top | item 47024202

(no title)

thih9 | 14 days ago

What is the pricing of Kimi.com?

Edit, self answer: https://www.kimi.com/membership/pricing

discuss

order

8cvor6j844qw_d6|14 days ago

The pricing looks great.

Significantly much better than ~ USD 50 per day on Anthropic API.

Any idea how good this model compares to Opus 4.6?

I tried Grok 4.1 Fast but the results are mild to put it kindly.

mekpro|14 days ago

Opus is definitely in its own league. I use Kimi/Gemini-cli code regularly to save cost and from my experience, Kimi 2.5 is more solid than Gemini Flash 3.0 for coding. While Gemini Flash 3.0 is generally faster, it usually break the syntax and skip important prompt. Kimi 2.5 can write very good code and can plan very well.

thatcat|14 days ago

I've been using kimi, though not kimiclaw, for research and it is good - comparable to phind, better than GLM 4.7 . Opus 4.6 wasn't as good for my particular domain of interest. I think the long term pricing asymptote for US vs china is essentially dependent on energy pricing and so china will continue to undercut US AI pricing.

quinncom|14 days ago

Did you scroll through the pricing options? The largest Kimi plan is $199/month. “Much better” depends on how much usage is included vs. Anthropic plans/API costs.

kaycey2022|13 days ago

Kimi 2.5 is a great model. Especially for writing, understanding many different text sources, reasoning etc. I haven't personally used it for coding.

knollimar|14 days ago

completely anecdote: vision seems > gemini 2.5 but less than 3.0

I haven't used it much for programming, but it feels like a model 6 months out of date for general use

jrmg|14 days ago

Am I not understanding something obvious, or does that not actually tell you what runtime you get for any of the plans?

Kim_Bruning|14 days ago

Super tempting.

Before you get one, do realize that Openclaws are a responsibility!