(no title)
calvinmorrison | 16 days ago
That's where I stopped.
Toolchains on linux distributions with adults running packaging are just fine.
Toolchains for $hotlanguage where the project leaders insist on reinventing the packaging game, are not fine.
I once again state these languages need to give up the NIH and pay someone mature and responsible to maintain packaging.
crote|16 days ago
And when it inevitably leads to all kinds of weird issues the packagers of course can't be reached for support, so users end up harassing the upstream maintainer about their "shitty broken application" and demanding they fix it.
Sure, the various language toolchains suck, but so do those of Linux distros. There's a reason all-in-one packaging solutions like Docker, AppImage, Flatpak, and Snap have gotten so popular, you know?
fao_|16 days ago
This is only the case for debian and derivatives, lol. Rolling-release distributions do not have this problem. This is why most of the new distributions coming out are arch linux based.
Pay08|16 days ago