(no title)
myself248 | 15 days ago
We'd probably get MP3 but not video to any great or compelling degree. Mostly-text web, perhaps more gopher-like. Client-side stuff would have to be very compact, I wonder if NAPLPS would've taken off.
Screen reader software would probably love that timeline.
iberator|15 days ago
Only thing that killed web for old computers is JAVASCRIPT.
vidarh|15 days ago
You're right we had graphical apps, but we did also have very little video. CuSeeMe existed - video conferencing would've still been a thing, but with limited resolution due to bandwidth constraints. Video in general was an awful low res mess and would have remained so if most people were limited to ISDN speeds.
While there were still images on the web, the amount of graphical flourishes were still heavily bandwidth limited.
The bandwidth limit they proposed would be a big deal even if CPU speeds continued to increase (it could only mitigate so much with better compression).
rbanffy|15 days ago
JavaScript is innocent. The people writing humongous apps with it are the ones to blame. And memory footprint. A 16 MB machine wouldn’t be able to hold the icons an average web app uses today.
cluckindan|15 days ago
phwbikm|15 days ago
rbanffy|15 days ago
rm30|15 days ago
Ironically, now I'm using an ESP32-S3, 10x more powerful, just to run Iot devices.
petra|15 days ago
drob518|15 days ago
fhars|15 days ago