[alexey-salmin]

I hope for the same, but it's based on the assumption that space exploration will be human-driven. Unfortunately it's possible that it will be robot-driven instead and museums will stay on earth.

[CableNinja]

I seriously doubt we will stay on earth like that. Humans have always been explorers and pioneers. You can only look at something through a screen for so long before you get the itch that you cant scratch through a screen. Humans will inevitably leave this planet.

Robots on other planets is a rough process. Most planets, lacking atmosphere, have dust that gets EVERYWHERE, and its really bad for mechanical, electrical operations. The moon has a static charge that causes the regolith powder to seep into the smallest cracks. Humanoid robots will not last long, and all other forms are just a single failure from uselessness. Until they can either self-repair, or repair others (meaning n+1 minimum robots sent), it will not be useful for long exploration. And, honestly, id be pretty worried to find robots that could self-repair or repair others. Thats just a small step away from self-replication, and that leads down other scary paths.

[Animats]

> Robots on other planets is a rough process.

By now, a lot of machinery has operated on Luna and Mars. That seems to be a solvable problem.

Venus, though... That's too hot. Last lander was in 1982 (USSR) and lasted about an hour and a half before overheating.

[avmich]

Would we bring the landing stage of Apollo-11 to Earth by the same logic?