(no title)
fleshmonad | 13 days ago
For prose, you can simply hard wrap at 80 (arguably you should), and vim supports this via a single config line. OOTB vim soft breaks anyway and you can navigate between in those broken lines via gj, gk etc.
Seems like bloat to me.
criddell|13 days ago
KPGv2|13 days ago
For a community that prides itself on "one small tool for a specific purpose," people sure like to use VIM for a thousand different purposes by hacking plugins. This used to be derided as the microsoft way decades ago.
For writing prose, I use an app specifically designed for writing prose: Scrivener. See elsewhere saying "you should change how you write in order to use version control when writing prose." Totally forgetting that there's been a version control for prose for literal decades: tracking changes in a word processor.
Do you want to process words? Use a word processor. Not a text editor. Writing prose isn't editing text.
1vuio0pswjnm7|13 days ago
I prefer writing with a mechanical pencil
For editing text on a screen, I prefer UNIX utilities ed, sed, ex/vi and custom filters written in C. The later can be used within ed or ex/vi via
The slow, error-prone step is getting the text _accurately_ from the paper to bits in the computer. A personalised OCR that can recognise own handwriting might be helpfulRoundish7334|13 days ago
CamT|13 days ago
cryptonector|13 days ago