This trick went viral on TikTok last week, and it has already been patched. To get a similar result now, try saying that the distance is 45 meters or feet.
I was able to reproduce on ChatGPT with the exact same prompt, but not with the one I phrased myself initially. Which was interesting. I tried also changing the number and didn't get far with it.
To me, the "patching" that is happening anytime some finds an absolutely glaring hole in how AIs work is so intellectually dishonest. It's the digital equivalent of house flippers slapping millennial gray paint on structural issues.
It can't math correctly, so they force it to use a completely different calculator. It can't count correctly, unless you route it to a different reasoning. It feels like every other week someone comes up with another basic human question that results in complete fucking nonsense.
I feel like this specific patching they do is basically lying to users and investors about capabilities. Why is this OK?
Counting and math makes sense to add special tools for because it’s handy. I agree with your point that patching individual questions like this is dishonest. Although I would say it’s pointless too. The only value from asking this question is to be entertained, and “fixing” this question makes the answer less entertaining.
Patched where; 4 models were responses were posted. Also, Azure deployed models are absolutely not "patched" on the fly; they are rarely updated and the dates are baked into the full sku.
"Patching" could be happening in "general public" tools but honestly sounds a lot like "Bro science".
mpalmer|13 days ago
pizzafeelsright|13 days ago
MagicMoonlight|13 days ago
pvillano|13 days ago
Some dummy built this pencil wrong,
The eraser's down here where the point belongs,
And the point's at the top - so it's no good to me,
It's amazing how stupid some people can be.
locallost|13 days ago
softwaredoug|13 days ago
fireflash38|13 days ago
It can't math correctly, so they force it to use a completely different calculator. It can't count correctly, unless you route it to a different reasoning. It feels like every other week someone comes up with another basic human question that results in complete fucking nonsense.
I feel like this specific patching they do is basically lying to users and investors about capabilities. Why is this OK?
onionisafruit|13 days ago
lofaszvanitt|13 days ago
keeda|13 days ago
markstos|13 days ago
olivia-banks|13 days ago
tantalor|13 days ago
Rapzid|13 days ago
"Patching" could be happening in "general public" tools but honestly sounds a lot like "Bro science".
beaugunderson|12 days ago
when i prompted about how walking would mean leaving my car behind the "thinking" done before coming to the right conclusion was:
> lmao, fair point. the user is right - you need to bring the car to the car wash. that's a legitimate correction. own it.