top | item 47043159

(no title)

Aristarkh | 13 days ago

The DOM-native architecture is a clever way to bypass API integration, but it introduces significant operational risk regarding state management. Since this agent executes checkouts and form fills, a hallucination here isn't just wrong text—it’s potentially an erroneous charge or data loss. How do you handle liability or remediation if the agent misinterprets a UI element and executes an unwanted transaction? Does the script enforce a "human-in-the-loop" confirmation step for high-stakes actions like payment submission, or is the goal full autonomy regardless of confidence levels?

discuss

order

arjunchint|13 days ago

We are still thinking through on the optimal usecases. Right now you can configure blocklists on url paths that the agent won't work on.

On the reliability front we offer integrations like Recordings to ground the agent on trajectories even as the underlying website updates and Knowledge Base of your whole domain.

You the website owner can provide additional guidance to the agent.