top | item 47044584 (no title) scott_w | 12 days ago That’s not my requirement, that’s SQLite’s requirement. If you want to dispute their claim, I recommend you write to them, however I strongly suspect they know more about this than you do. discuss order hn newest viraptor|12 days ago I know it's on the sqlite side. I'm familiar with the claim and disagree with it. scott_w|11 days ago You’re arguing in this context:> wouldn't the ability to automatically rewrite sqlite in Rust be a valuable asset?If you want to rewrite SQLite, you must accept their position. Otherwise you simply aren’t rewriting SQLite, you’re writing your own database. load replies (1)
viraptor|12 days ago I know it's on the sqlite side. I'm familiar with the claim and disagree with it. scott_w|11 days ago You’re arguing in this context:> wouldn't the ability to automatically rewrite sqlite in Rust be a valuable asset?If you want to rewrite SQLite, you must accept their position. Otherwise you simply aren’t rewriting SQLite, you’re writing your own database. load replies (1)
scott_w|11 days ago You’re arguing in this context:> wouldn't the ability to automatically rewrite sqlite in Rust be a valuable asset?If you want to rewrite SQLite, you must accept their position. Otherwise you simply aren’t rewriting SQLite, you’re writing your own database. load replies (1)
viraptor|12 days ago
scott_w|11 days ago
> wouldn't the ability to automatically rewrite sqlite in Rust be a valuable asset?
If you want to rewrite SQLite, you must accept their position. Otherwise you simply aren’t rewriting SQLite, you’re writing your own database.