top | item 47044950

(no title)

tokioyoyo | 12 days ago

> What makes you believe this?

Simply, cut-throat competition. Given multiple nations are funding different AI-labs, quality of output and speed are one of the most important things.

discuss

order

philipwhiuk|12 days ago

Dating apps also have cut-throat competition and none of them are optimised for minimising the time you spend on the app.

dymk|12 days ago

They don’t, they’re all owned by Match group

_345|12 days ago

~90% of them are owned by Match

forgetfreeman|12 days ago

sigh We're doing this lie again? Quality of Outcome is not, has never been, and if the last 40 years are anything to go on will never be a core or even tangential goal. Dudes are trying to make the stock numbers go up and get paid. That's it. That's all it ever is.

wordpad|12 days ago

You're just being pedantic and cynical.

Goal of any business in principle is profit, by your terms all of them are misaligned.

Matter of fact is that customers are receiving value and the value has been a good proxy for which company will grow to be successful and which will fail.

stoneforger|12 days ago

Hey man people either get it or they don't. We're doomed.

delusional|12 days ago

How is nation-states funding private corporations "cut-throat competition"?

tokioyoyo|12 days ago

Ok, to be very honest I wrote that in the middle of having a couple of drinks. I guess, what I mean is, countries are funding AI labs because it can turn into a “winner-takes-it-all” competition. Unless the country starts blocking the leading providers.

Private companies will turn towards the best, fastest, cheapest (or some average of them). Country borders don’t really matter. All labs are fighting to get the best thing out in the public for that reason, because winning comes with money, status, prestige, and actually changing the world. This kind of incentives are rare.

enraged_camel|12 days ago

What does this even mean? Are you disputing the fact that AI labs are competing with each other because they are funded by nation-states?

psychoslave|12 days ago

Cut throat competition between nations is usually called war. In war, gathering as much information as possible on everyone is certainly a strategic wanna do. Selling psyops about how much benefits will come for everyone willing to join the one sided industrial dependency also is a thing. Giving significant boost to potentially adversarial actors is not a thing.

That said universe don't obligate us to think the cosmos is all about competition. Cooperation is always possible as a viable path, often with far more long term benefits at scale.

Competition is superfluous self inflict masochism.