[barbazoo]

> Pick up the can!

Gotta admit, this triggered me. I don’t think those are the same thing. If no one had a good password we wouldn’t affect each other negatively. If no one picked up trash, we would.

Edit: Sorry folks, didn’t get the reference.

[estebank]

I'm pretty sure it's referencing Half-Life 2, where an agent of an oppressive regime tells you to pick up a can that they just dropped on the floor as a sadistic display of authority (and to provide world-building and teach the grab mechanics to the player).

The GP is equating policies for strong passwords that aren't trivially cracked with authoritarianism.

If no one had a good password, we actually would affect each other negatively. If your personal banker can be easily compromised, that means that you could be easily parted with your money.

I do agree that they are not the same thing.

[empyrrhicist]

> The GP is equating policies for strong passwords that aren't trivially cracked with authoritarianism.

Incorrect - the requirements I mentioned make passwords less memorable and less secure (maximum length 12???). Obviously that's not as bad as authoritarianism, but I was trying to capture the arbitrary act being forced on us for no real justifiable reason.

[smlavine]

It's a Half-Life 2 reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJshjMyg6no